I hope they read this.įWIW, Picktorial seems to read my Aperture libraries so perhaps will be my emergency backup if Aperture finally breaks completely before I can replace it. Immediate response asking for understanding of their workload (unusual customer service) and then quite a bit later a response asking once again for additional information which they already had. Then the exact same 2 things happened again. I didn't think they needed to ask this question based upon what I had sent but careful answered it.
Luminar e-mailed back immediately to explain how busy and understaffed they were and several weeks later -mailed me again but to ask me a clarifying question. I carefully documented what I had done and included samples of the results in an e-mail to support.
On1 effects 10 vs on1 2018 software#
HOWEVER, while using their software to batch process a handful of images I got unusable results and couldn't figure out why. I'm still waiting and hopeful they deliver. Luminar has promised a DAM and as that's what I need I decided to get involved. Luminar offers a good product that like On1 is a suite of software that works well together.
They've upgraded it several times and each one seemed to be an improvement previously spoken about by their users which means a lot. On1 is also really committed to the improvement of this product. For one thing On1 is MUCH faster and if all things are equal that really matters. It's "just" the best RAW processor.Īs you mention editing RAW files and ask about 2 titles the better of the two is On1. It's not a suite of special effects titles. First of all the best software to process Fuji RAW files is Iridient, hands down. Thanks for your tips as I am not sure which one I should buy.Īs it turns out I have been searching for a great Aperture DAM replacement and purchased each of these while "on sale" to try. Anyone could say which software performs better in terms of editing Fuji RAW files? Anyone of this 2 is able to deal with lossless RAW too?
0 kommentar(er)
